Sikkim tribal leader condemns climb of Sacred Mount Kangchenjunga, calls it a failure of State and Ecclesiastical Departments

A strong controversy has erupted in Sikkim after news surfaced that a team climbed Mount Kangchenjunga from the Nepal side. This has deeply upset many indigenous communities in the state, especially the Bhutia and Lepcha people, who hold the mountain as a sacred living deity. For them, Kangchenjunga is not just a mountain but a vital part of their faith, traditions, and culture.

Senior tribal leader and Chief Advisor of BJP Sikkim, Tseten Tashi Bhutia, has openly criticized the climb. He called the incident a serious failure by the Sikkim State Government and the Ecclesiastical Department, which is supposed to protect the state’s religious and cultural values. In a firm statement, Bhutia expressed, “We feel great sorrow and strongly oppose the recent climbing of Mount Kangchenjunga from the Nepal side, even after repeated requests to respect its sacredness.”

Bhutia explained that for the indigenous people of Sikkim, Kangchenjunga is much more than just the third highest mountain in the world. “It is our Guardian Deity. It is sacred and must never be seen as a mere adventure spot for thrill-seekers,” he said. He also pointed out that the sanctity of Kangchenjunga is protected by Article 371F of the Indian Constitution, which gives special rights to Sikkim to preserve its unique traditions.

The mountain is partly located in Sikkim and partly in Nepal, and it holds great spiritual meaning. Each year, the people of Sikkim celebrate the Pang Lhabsol festival to honor Kangchenjunga. During this festival, locals perform rituals and prayers, seeking blessings from the sacred mountain, showing their respect and gratitude.

Bhutia also expressed frustration with the state government’s lack of response. “We are very disappointed by the silence from Sikkim’s government on this cultural and spiritual violation,” he said. “The government should not just remain quiet but take strong steps to protect these sacred symbols that are central to our identity.”

He further questioned why Indian authorities have not taken stricter measures when compared to other countries. “If China can ban climbing on Mount Kailash out of respect for its religious importance, why can’t our government protect Kangchenjunga in the same way?” he asked.